Using Personal Capital for Retirement Planning

I’ve used Personal Capital’s retirement calculator (the platform is now called Empower, though most people still call it Personal Capital) for about four years to track my retirement projections. The tool has gotten meaningfully better over that time, and I’ve developed a clear sense of what it does well, where it falls short, and how to get the most out of it.

This is a deep look at the specific features and how to use them effectively.

Getting Started: Account Aggregation Is the Foundation

The calculator is only as good as the data feeding it. The first step is linking your financial accounts — 401k, IRAs, taxable brokerage, bank accounts, any debt. Personal Capital supports connections with most major financial institutions, though some smaller credit unions and certain account types (like solo 401ks at smaller custodians) may require manual entry.

Plan to spend 30-45 minutes on initial setup connecting all your accounts. Once linked, the aggregation updates automatically — you only need to reconnect when you change a password or when a connection breaks (which happens occasionally). I check my connections quarterly to catch any that have dropped.

Setting Up Your Retirement Goals

The calculator prompts you for:

  • Current age and target retirement age
  • Expected lifespan (they suggest a conservative 90+ by default)
  • Annual spending in retirement — this is the trickiest input
  • Additional income sources: Social Security, pensions, rental income, part-time work

The annual spending estimate is where most people have the least confidence. The tool will suggest a number based on your linked account spending data, which is a useful starting point. I’d recommend adjusting for things you expect to change in retirement: a paid-off mortgage reduces housing costs, healthcare typically increases, travel may increase in early retirement and decrease later. The calculator lets you enter spending in different phases of retirement, which is more accurate than a single flat number.

Social Security Estimates

You can connect your Social Security account or manually enter your estimated benefit. I’d recommend getting your actual projected benefit from ssa.gov before entering anything — the Social Security statement shows your projected benefit at different claiming ages, which helps you model the tradeoff between claiming at 62, 67, or 70.

One scenario I run: Social Security benefits at 75% of projected amounts. There are real questions about long-term program solvency, and planning for a haircut rather than assuming full benefits is prudent for people more than 15 years from retirement.

The Monte Carlo Simulation in Plain Language

This is the calculator’s most valuable and most misunderstood feature. The tool runs thousands of market simulations — essentially asking: “If history repeated itself in different sequences, what percentage of futures end with you still having money?”

The result is a probability of success score. If you get 78%, that means in 22% of the simulated scenarios, your projected spending would eventually exceed your projected assets. It doesn’t mean you’d definitely run out of money — it means that in those scenarios, you’d need to adjust (spend less, work a bit longer, or take less risk-averse actions). The simulation is a stress test and a guide, not a prediction.

I target 85%+ and feel comfortable there. The adjustment tools let you see how specific changes affect your probability score in real time:

  • Retire one year later: often adds 3-5% to the probability score
  • Save $200/month more: visible immediate improvement
  • Reduce projected annual spending by $5,000: significant impact
  • Add projected Social Security income: often the single biggest positive input

Scenario Analysis

This is the feature I use most frequently for actual decision-making. I’ve modeled: What if I take a year off at 50? What if I retire at 62 vs. 65? What if my equity compensation vests lower than projected? What if healthcare costs 25% more than I’ve budgeted?

Seeing these scenarios quantified changes how you think about the tradeoffs. It’s the difference between “I think I can probably afford to take a sabbatical” and “taking a year off drops my probability of success by 6 points, which I can recover if I increase savings by $X for the following three years.”

The Investment Checkup Tool

Adjacent to the retirement calculator and worth using separately. The investment checkup compares your current asset allocation against a target allocation for your age and risk tolerance, and calculates the fees embedded in your current investments.

The fee analysis is where I’ve seen this be most revelatory for people who haven’t examined their portfolio in a while. Someone holding actively managed mutual funds at 1.2% expense ratios, when equivalent index funds cost 0.03-0.05%, is paying 10-30x more than necessary. On a $300,000 portfolio, that’s roughly $3,000-3,500 per year in excess fees that compound negatively over decades. The tool makes this concrete rather than abstract.

The Advisory Services Component

Personal Capital/Empower offers human financial advisors who use the platform’s data as a foundation. Minimums are typically $100,000 in investable assets, with fees ranging from 0.49% to 0.89% annually depending on account size.

I haven’t used the advisory services. The free tools handle my needs, and I’m comfortable managing my own investments. For people with complex situations — business ownership, significant equity compensation, estate planning needs, substantial assets in multiple types of accounts — the advisory offering is reasonably priced compared to traditional fee-only advisors, who typically charge 1-1.5% annually. The combination of the planning technology and human oversight has value for the right person.

Limitations to Know About

The platform’s default Social Security assumptions may be optimistic given long-term program uncertainty. The spending projection assumes your current lifestyle continues — adjust manually for expected changes. The tool doesn’t model sequence-of-returns risk as explicitly as some other approaches. And the behavioral nudge toward engaging their advisory services is subtle but present — the platform has commercial incentives to show you your retirement outlook as moderately uncertain.

Despite those caveats, it remains the best free retirement planning tool I’ve found. The combination of real account data, Monte Carlo simulation, and scenario analysis produces more actionable insight than any spreadsheet I’ve built — and I’ve built comprehensive ones. For most people, spending two hours setting it up and then reviewing it quarterly is worth more than many hours of passive financial content consumption.

Richard Hayes

Richard Hayes

Author & Expert

Richard Hayes is a Certified Financial Planner (CFP) with over 20 years of experience in wealth management and retirement planning. He previously worked as a financial advisor at major institutions before becoming an independent consultant specializing in retirement strategies and investment education.

243 Articles
View All Posts

Stay in the loop

Get the latest wildlife research and conservation news delivered to your inbox.